modes of making art always wary of the multiplicity . Therefore, we continue to be valuable chronicle all the forms that were designed to limit this proliferation. It's easy to invent buzzwords, clichés. loss aura assayed by Benjamin and is, so much of her writing, just another common among other .
However, the claim of uniqueness, of individuality last of all the work we find it (and not at all paradoxically) a key and strong in our social practices.
education figures such as the ready-made or found footage let it be clear: what is conceived serial demolishing their value can increase from simple gesture of a kidnapping . For ready-made, found footage or object trouvé (like the détournement, all different copies of the same family) determine that removal is an asset founding. The removal of habitat, change the use for which they were conceived. Technology
diverted. Let us once again: barbarize art languages \u200b\u200b technology.
relations between art and technology do not hold any other course.
a technological work of art is when it occurs in both technology author. Of course there is a wide range of technology author and the vast majority of these events have nothing to do with art. The difference is basic: barbarized technology or simply closes itself. Prevents or question their proliferation. already know: what is often perceived, uninformed, as absurd and useless does not suggest the removal of a widespread social use .
I am increasingly interested in the work of Argentine artist Leonello Zambon. In its proposals for mobile laboratories. Two paradigms are combined in each of his works sophistication and precarious.
come back to him and his projects in future postings.
New technologies can only seem to accept the uniqueness of the tune through software (and really is not any tune). In the limited selection of certain assumptions held by design.
In ways such as in the choice of desktop reasons. Tell me how you have your screen and tell you that much more problematical aesthetic everyday social life. To a lesser extent the type of operating system and programs that articulate, after all, adopting Linux both an ideology, as a way of thinking the world .
But in all cases the system that powers your computer is exactly the same as that of millions of other machines. A clone among so many other . It is precisely at this point in which art exposes their differences.
More than ever, the art of today trace their positions and strategies in a cultural history virtuality us within one chapter by others unpublished.
All software hardware demands, but two hemispheres are not the same. two relatively independent dimensions and from a certain point of view, no one could tell what commands which. We are witnessing the most accurate metaphor on contemporary behaviors virtuality.
The material and virtual for centuries were presented showing their rank in society, after all, the virtual is nothing different state of material. I wrote on another occasion that we know as virtual for centuries was no different to the dustbin reality. But this relationship does not keep time the same proportions.
More and more we define ourselves in the virtual. More and more we communicate through means that were more determined in both virtual materials. Does Dolly put us on alert? Everyone today (at least in part) Dolly the sheep. Again the ABC cyborg theory: the software that defines us can be cloned indefinitely. No hardware
or software that is not articulated in a complex of metaphors. Navigation cyberspace and so many other figures that appropriated the imagery technology and glossaries of science fiction.
Need to learn more about the technology the day after tomorrow?
Lee (or relay) to Tinianov .
however, still difficult to accept, at least en masse, we are constituted by these forms of narrative and what we call science fiction, more than ever, it is not just another variable time.
0 comments:
Post a Comment