My Dog Keeps Biting At His Back Legs

communication technology basically used to digitize the nonsense

Katies Playground Movies

Ankylosaurus Fiction

Why should the continued success, and other mixed-porno versions of famous fictional characters? Why so popular?

In all types of styles: from White to The Flintstones of Futurama to Tintin in Ninja Turtles to Sesame Street and Smurfs, the list is endless.

Does the porn works in these cases as a sub-genre of parody? "Backwards? Is it just that? Is other empathic relationship with a presence that we want to close?
and desecrates Are these legendary figures or on the contrary, puts them at a different stage of admiration?
Anyway, does not decay, but rather the opposite: This Is not Star Trek XXX, porn version produced by Hustler, stars none other than Sasha Grey , for its part, the producer Vivid is announcing a series of versions porn superhero sagas.

Does Hentai is a consequence or an accelerator of what I mean?

What kind of reasoning leads a Second Life user that shapes their avatar as Pikachu or Hulk to submerge immediately in an orgy in the continent "adult" Zindra ? Is it an extension of the greed porn viewer intuitively delves into his bench trying to explore feelings of all possible ways, intimate with them from other fantasy ?
Is another way to understand the fanfictions ? Whether
detractors few examples more perverse than projected on Teletubbies. Not surprisingly
versions Lara Croft porn have accelerated the rapid growth of video games market porn.

too many topics in one.
web Virtuality and did nothing to multiply an old symptom. I was amused (and impressed) read, many years ago, that Burt Ward (actor who personified Robin in the unforgettable and so popular sixties version of Batman ) confessed in his autobiography (My Life in Tights , something like my life in tights ) that with Adam West (Bat Man for that matter), starred in more than a few forays sex where their superhero costumes to fulfill a role no less. is more, to reveal short XXX filmed in parallel with the production of the series. Batiorgías "in the Batcave? also heard and read that there are hotels which specialize in these imaginary.

may be rightly argue and the argument of consumption (once again sell the same story but otherwise), even as we were saying, the indiscriminate spread of the parody genre (in fact, is a porn parody industry itself).

should not be strange that these raids the gender of the heroes and heroines of fiction are not necessarily parodic. Should be
fetishization elements that make up a fictional character? Indeed. These trips do not lead us to rethink what role-the function-that these fictional creations have in our lives? "In our culture?
days ago, remembered with Fabián Casas something Nabokov said in reference to the characters created by Tolstoy : early twentieth century it was customary for many Russian citizens they referred to them ( A nna Karenina, for example) as an existing person.

Both the Argentine media time devoted to a character like Ricardo Fort how much is it fiction? How much porn evening? Is there not a balance tacit media construction of celebrity and the pornographic gaze immediately adhering to it?
course is an exaggeration, but every time we are assailed by the sensation that some kind of celebrity exalted by the media seems far fabricated pornographic consumption. And the fiction that it is key to making this happen .

Two examples in the same blog (two posts from Technicolor Town ) porn fascism and his show (on the scandals of Silvio Berlusconi Villa Certosa ) and three stories about the relationship between knowledge- power-modern image . Everything you just wrote is nothing more than a marginal annotation these readings.

Use External Hard Drive With Vip222k

Trollcontamination

Why not understand the Troll as a aesthetics ?
Is not it? I mean one look . One way to be seen .

In fables inspired by Nordic mythology is nothing that a function: it represents a way of behaving (the linkbaiting can become a fashion of our base emotions ). Envy and resentment and all its derivatives and its tributaries. trolls are not born, but mutated in them. The Deleuzian well may say, we become trolls.

Again, a troll is a trademark of low visibility. In a culture of electronic networks the troll becomes visible in the comments .

Umberto Eco "devotes a chapter in his History of Ugliness ? It would be nice to argue that we were most interested in art Feist the last two centuries is the reflection-subsequent to the demonstration, the ugliness of as their own, as a way of self-analysis . How do we participate in that low?
Banality of Evil (Hannah Arendt dixit): under many masks we hide? Evil can be fun if you happen to others.

no coincidence that the electronic trolls are at 99% anonymous . Anything less is a symptom: few want to take over that aspect own. I'm not saying anything we do not know if I describe the troll as shock. Although it would be too simplistic to delineate only as other social modes of "catharsis do."

However, it should not move obvious. The "state-troll " always implies a target . Somewhere to shoot ( a troll by definition never download against himself). The troll understands that white violates it, takes away something: visibility Or perhaps what the troll is trying to contaminate the visibility?

In the ecology of media invariably the troll is a polluting factor. is pollution. Why not is ironic that many media continue to give so much attention to the comments , which are the biggest troll preserve (some even say to the media comments are like on TV rating will it be as well?). Such reason has when Guillermo Piro insists comments are almost always written by someone who is sick in the head . And immediately clear: only worthwhile when the expansion of the commentary is moderate.

That is, when the dialog we can not hide under no mask . When it is necessary
becoming-troll. Information

polluted in opinología trash! Something egocentric
poorly digested in the trolls. Look at me! As demanded certain subjects in a Laurie Anderson song ( Language is a virus.)

I am absolutely in favor of comment moderation. Tomorrow we will undertake to

Lux Lindner another of those experiments that we all love : A public walk through the exhibition entitled The Futurist Universe . That is, we propose footnotes page-oral, occasional comments, calligraphy vocal on the sidelines of the exhibition of the hosts of Filippo Tommaso Marinetti and his boys can be visited at Foundation Buenos Aires bow.

Futurists proposed not only contemplating machine (the machine as an aesthetic fact, as most current work itself " the battle of Samothrace" ) also noted war as a aesthetics. "The beauty of war." But see the difference: the futuristic marching to war. They showed themselves as artists soldiers (there was his body, his sense of risk).

That is the maximum difference with the aggressive trolls : after all, a troll is something outside, a voice that pollute but which nobody is responsible. The troll wants to have no subject, produced as a simple and powerful statement corrosive.
Subject "trash? Absolutely at its lowest level. Waste
information is surpassed only by those who consume it.

Behaviors "Trolls : Members actively causing conflicts.
Hunters or provoking trolls: They behave according to the principle of 'second shot." not initiate the conflict, but intensified when it begins. Other trolls often use as an excuse for their own bad behavior, and in many cases qualify a user as troll, despite the latter purposes.
Indifferent: They try to ignore the conflict, continuing the original topic of discussion. Often expressed disdain for the troll carefree, but not actively pursue insult. They behave like big brothers, spreading words of wisdom like "Do not nourish the trolls" or other phrases that normally mean the same thing: "Ignore the boisterous and so give up and go away." Such responses can be taken as a passive-aggressive provocateur trolls. Moderators
: No moderators of the system but users attempting to "solve" the conflict, pleasing to all parties if possible. Viewers
: We depart from the conflict. In particularly bad cases, leave the forum in disgust. Kidnappers
: start a discussion off topic in response to a troll provocative messages.
trolls Non-: Members who are qualified to troll for other users or moderators to be more easily silenced and discredited. "

A statement that you want to build a" complaint effect "-to emphasize that claim unduly visibility and transforms itself into a spectacle of misery cultural.

Expiration Dates On Mayonnaise Packets

nothing is ever enough Web

We learning to compile what they learn from Internet . not from the web, but the network itself, while presence and functionality. Everyone has their ranking.

At the top of mine, in my top 5, it remains certain that nothing is ever enough.

What attracts me to the web, rather than its immediacy or revolution in communication is the most expansive ever availability. It the'm just linking yes (Wiring continuity and the redefinition of what we mean by homogeneous and heterogeneous ), but above all the certainty that it is always better to know another of what we were looking .

Eduardo Rey told me days ago, a story rescued by Pascal Quignard on a famine in the Roman Empire .

On how the lack of food had made an entire population cannibals. I felt I was reliving the movie The Road , "the latest film by Viggo Mortensen "Directed by John Hillcoat (so close to Nick Cave ) based on a novel by Cormac McCarthy . What sense does the search for originality? builds its new reality of what we already knew.

The end (the end as an entity ) perimenopausal certainly not for its progressive but expansive (to the sides). Whenever understand better than all the poems in the world are not enough, all the songs in the world are not all films the world will never reach us .
Internet continues to teach us that so close to everything you look for another one or find another one and another one that precedes or is simultaneous with it.

I talked about my ranking . Internet keeps alive the feeling that this ranking can change and change and change . I think that's a big difference with modern thought, even with modern taste, with the idiotic claim to be (culturally) the first at something, to wield some sort of origin. Did you hear
version of The Dark Side of The Moon of Flaming Lips? We were not even enough to version of Pink Floyd !
Or do a good cover does not reinvent a song? Undoubtedly, it is
possible that everything has been said, but can still go back to say everything and be just as fabulous as before or better! course, it is imperative to re-invent other ways of saying the same thing. Put it this way: new is just saying what we already know but otherwise .

We thought someone had invented a sound. On the Internet find so many others who were in the same before or at the same time. A few months ago Paul Schanton quoted Stephin Merritt, of Magnetics Fields when he confessed: "For some reason I am completely incapable of doing something new with the pop song. How depressing. "

In the same column Excess composition, also highlighted the statement made by Andrés Calamaro in Eme Efe site: "We are not in the twentieth century and not stop feeling that the model of rock song could be completed. Conclude as did the tango song that has a beginning and an end. (...) And recordings of the Beatles at Abbey Road end. "
need to change the foreshortening and ask how much it take to tire a spectator or a composer or an operator of any of a way to observe a cultural form?

Why temporality of historical context should exhaust a form?
How many times have we heard that the novel is dead ? What movies died? What blogs died! I still believe that there is something very stupid in the parricide, even if it is installed in the genetic memory of our culture.

quick So we got tired of reading, seeing, listening? I mean, not knowing invent other ways of reading, seeing and hearing the same thing. If not for the boys of Cahiers du Cinéma , Hitchcock perhaps today would be dead.

The same happens to me with the belief that wealth goes against quality. I can only remember mocking Anthony Burgess's group Bloomsbury group (which belonged among other Virginia Woolf and Strachey Hilton) and his criticism of militant prolificacy. "Enough openings! "I used to cry.

We do not have to worry about. We can all write a good verse. Even a great verse. But very few are able to write ten good poems.