How To Make Spine Tester

Are not more and more couples are filmed having sex? ( see ).
Are not more and more couples having sex footage circulating on the Internet? ( see ).

Do not imitate the professional porn increasingly on their aesthetic porn casual, homey? ( see ).

Is not a phenomenon not so distant that of Flickrs Fotologs and where thousands and thousands of people we open the doors of their privacy? If eroticism promised and was based on a secret, porn all enabled.
Do not grow the supply of sex webcams? ( see ).
Do not multiply opportunities as CAM4 portals, where he sexually no other intimacies-demand porn a spectator? ( see ).

If the porn is defined as the ability to view sex is porn the same subject (who notes) which continues to expand its appetite.

Everything begins to look with eyes porn. For the eyes (our eyes) are metabolizing the mediation of the image. Perhaps soon there may be massive contact lenses augmented reality?
reality as another videogame, among others. ( see ). Porn

prosumisión . ( see ). Porn made by producers and consumers. If a story about porn visited blogs and web portals in recent weeks, this was the order of the producers and stars of adult films "which, through YouTube and other sites, asking anyone who would listen to buy porn.
" work for you. We want to excite and amuse . " ( see ).

Watch this video. And this. Read their claims. ( see ).

Meanwhile, l words are as moving: Confucius was right . Never again split schemes of visual and word.

live the absolute triumph of the visual: the promise of seeing everything we invade. Practices such as the advantage Found Footage: footage from security cameras are usually a great material to reconstruct stories there that nobody dared to look. ( see ).

The visual-junk is re-quoted. Do not do anything different to offer see, see, watch and keep watching?

If sex was the possibility to reuse all the senses, lost in touch, smells, tastes, some time ago that even the sounds seem an epiphenomenon of the visual. Visuality dominates everything (although, Jay M artin , we note that increasingly distrusts her more, but this, we also know, is transient). Did
virtual sex is not the total victory of the visual? ( see ).

The image is more and more dissociated from the rest of the senses. It makes us believe that it replaces. You can rearrange them, to teach the world (our environment) without more than a fading role of the rest. Maffesoli

insists modernity has failed to curb the untamed, the brutal of our most atavistic instincts. ( see ). Virtual sex (experiences in a 3D digital platform, in a world of software) they reduce everything to a viewer who wants to star.
there is no longer a protagonist who is not privileged spectator.

Spectator, not necessarily reader.
not about the evolution of the Gutenberg Galaxy . Did
there is something more private than reading?

While there is representation, as can be seen, the reign of the image will not be absolute. The concept of representation reminds us that there is something else. That there is something represented.
we not be valued only as images.
Perhaps our task (our challenge) is to help our other senses to give more battle. ( see .)

proclaim that everything can not be seen. That the spectator porn has its limitations. That closing more and more possibilities. Porno
remains, too, see what we already knew we were going to see.
fascinates and seduces Porn precisely and predictability (the kamasutra exhausted his catalog). The avant-garde classics
clamored for eroticism over pornography.
When eroticism is but one of the variables of secrecy. Reinventing

privacy (because there is nothing more strategic that privacy). Reinventing their meanings, uses and consequences.