Feeling Hungry With The Stomach Flu

Loop / land

Culture and recycling policies

Recycling can be understood in two senses. Or three.

Here. First . propose a new cycle to an object, material, even an experience. insist on the same, but otherwise. omit or abdicate the possibility of starting from scratch.

Segundo. persist in submitting to that object, or material or experience the same cycle, with the aim of deepening effects. In this case repetition loop in charge. "We would understand

the ready-made adscribiéramos if the first possibility? Say it is another trip for the same ship . With the exception of one invent functions previously had been awarded.

This possibility (this extended sense, with all the political, economic and aesthetic mostly entails) was and continues to constitute, as we know, a major scandals modernity.

Of course, in our age of digital reproducibility alternatives become even more complex (check Mercedes Bunz). We live in virtual recycle time literally uncontrollable. Return to this point. In

the case of trash, recycling is directly invent (the object, material, etc) a new life. Another life. This is a key difference with the ready-made. Somehow, the trash does not get rid of its past "under" .
obedience to a theory of value could say that in the ready-made object leaves the destination below to go to another site while the trash displacement is minimal or even no .

The trash does not change the state, but only assessment.
There were those who saw in the ready-made a kind of parody of transubstantiation. The trash belongs, of course, to the second possibility.

But I said there was a third, which is what interests me at this time. And it is ( Third) of another rate provide .
cycle change such as changes in pulse progress.

We only have to remember gender as the cool jazz or trip-hop . Even the slow-rock . If the first purchases his legend in malfunction of recording equipment (runs slower on the register slowdown tempo original implementation), the trip-hop and slow rock mounted and perfected this failure, making their subsequent proceedings style.

If we agree with Nicolas Bourriaud that "the major aesthetic fact of our time lies in the crossing of the respective properties of space and time , which transforms the latter into something so tangible as a hotel room, there is little doubt about the capital of this speed change. Bourriaud continues: "For these new modes of spatialization of time, contemporary art forms suitable place to capture the experience of the world, through practical could call time-specific, in response to site-specific art of '60s, and the introduction in the composition of works of figures taken from the spatial displacement (rancid, journeys, expeditions). "

may object to me: not every change in the structure is properly recycled. But the fact is that tempo change makes everything change following (almost) exactly the same and yet different. speed (more, less) reinvents the time.

How cycles are altered in the era of speed? This question ends definitely be conclusive. Recycling
involved in all cases, we advance, another orbiting, orbit configuration differential.
It is difficult to agree with Diedrich Diederichsen : the loop expands and enforces. And our cultural perceptions are directly proportional to the tempo of these loops .

Recycling finally perverts abandonment. Stretch. Loop perhaps is not a way to not go? also perpetuate the goal, no doubt. Meta by definition never leaves the starting point .

wrote recently: "One way not to go." I need to clarify. not go, yes, but not to reaffirm the closeness . Recycling (and loop) allow us to be very, very far without moving on the same site .

Gateway Mouse Model Moakuo

WHAT CAN BE SAID IN THESE CASES?

- Have you ever born?

"No, not yet. We are in the final.

- What is a boy or girl?

-girl.

"You must be worried, right?

- Why?

"Look, if more comes out when a Moor. Or worse with black. *

* The interlocutor is 42 and he is serious.

Winn Dixie.com Application

And we are also the style of our hard disk

is clear: us the information we collect on our hard drive .
The not delete. The one that lasts longer .

That amount of folders full of files that we create in our minds virtual and end up being our diary.
Our box of belongings.
Our voices black box.
All this accumulation of elements that defines us.

Each computer is a guardian of our subjectivity. Of our ways of relating to the world.
Does not it is called "personal computer ?

is not difficult to realize that every hard disk has style. In its way, the regulations and classifications by we choose daily are building a facility.
also a lab (test site).

thoughts turn to the Voyager space probes or the Pioneer surfing the galaxy, rather distant places, carrying gold records an edition of treasures of mankind. Our computer also is a storehouse of valuable information for each one of us (in his own way an autobiography other data) to refurbish the day. Finally
a hacker (or rather, a cracker ) is not only a plunderer of our stories (Of the elements that constitute it.)

course, for many centuries the stories of the world was so much less. Many.
Too many less? Think
as detailed in the journal Mr. Samuel Pepys, in the late seventeenth century (an outpost of the stories of intimacy).
Consider also the dynamics of the literary salons . clubs in nineteenth-century English gentlemen (Terry Eagleton the institutes as the nucleus of what we call critical ). Voices
too lonely, too unique, too private.
Even then multiplied voices like an avalanche. We
absorbing more and more and more voices.
Do most blame is demography? Does literacy? Does the press? Do museums? Are the mass media? Does the Internet?

is a fact: each generation of artists has to live with more and more stories available (at some time enough for him a handful of myths). Information sharing: narrative. The beautiful

documentary It Might Get Loud, Davis Guggenheim of , hear the voice of Jack White sentence: "You must unite the family. You must be part of it. Family of storytellers. (...) People get ideas and new tricks to tell the same story differently. We all do the same. We seek to share something with another human being . "

Both were written in recent years about the self as spectacle on the horizon of Web 2.0 and their cultures . But the truth is that every artist has to live hour by hour with so many stories that will affect his already impossible to proceed without entrenched in the earthquake unstoppable voices.

As surely as everyone chooses the voices you want to hear (read, see). Voices and images say say (Fixed, moveable) . Between stories and narratives and stories and more stories.

Each Fotolog is a narrative, each Flickr it is also every blog and every new release of Buzz . Even the videos themselves that got on Youtube or Vimeo (or any other similar platform). Stories that have a lot of daily batch of photos and random moments.
We talked much about the subject days ago in the city of Rosario in the meeting organized by Favorite Sister.

Elsewhere in the film, Jack White talks about his devotion to discovery and the bluesman Son House . " I identified a thousand ways. I did not know that was possible. Just sing and clap. It meant everything. (...) One man against the world in song. I heard everything disappeared. It did not matter to clap out of time. No matter that did not have instruments. All that mattered was the attitude of the song . " U

No artist is a voice, a set of images, words, sounds, objects . A set of objects such as those set forth in a showcase Inne Monoambiente Martino. You're seeing a wall of my house, Pam Passage of Rosario. Books, records, statements. Forms.
(Some images of this blog posting are your , and the last is Virginia Negri).

That is the question. told with what we have, just as that which accumulated almost without realizing it defines us, and at all times speak for us .