Novel "in Twitter?
Cinema "for Youtube?
What do we assess when we encounter an experience like Chicken Serial ? Does the state of the novel or the possibilities of Twitter? Or both?
For when a movement of filmmakers who just filmed for YouTube? Is not there already? No programs or serials, but feature films.
Exactly the opposite of Benjamin and his commentators , the moment that most attracts me is half when, immediately after their extensive introduction, Everything seems maladjusted , when the ghost of the past disqualifies formats and demands what he is not interested in providing. Benjamin like Luchino Visconti divine knew that elegant decadence is when it is formatted in aristocracy.
The mistrust and awkwardness to technology socially passes for many as a sign of cultural aristocracy .
Should not we ask for the umpteenth time what experimental ? What is the role? In fact the more I question is another round in what way experimental aging?
Is not there something moving in an avant-garde in years? What if complejizáramos
again not always easy relations between experimental and avant-garde ?
more so when we agree to recognize the avant-garde (and modern interior) as a chapter "momentary, definitely? closed.
live stories and myths (thankfully). Do not follow naming experimental to decoupling that occurs between our way of perceiving (which we expect to receive) and the test site that explores the possibilities of delayed or denied to half ? We have difficulty so often call it natural to decode so fast that we hardly realize.
For example, these genres that have no name yet, or at least not a definitive name, made possible by the immense file that the web provides us ( idiots and so fun jokes made with images obtained from the same network) are so old and new while no one dares to claim them as an aesthetic .
Fernando Castro Florez. "The historical development had limited dematerialized trends, although the result is anathematize paint and attach to the contextualization (what is loosely called "installation ") certificate of naturalization. But the shift to the sociologist, the "political rhetoric " or the scandals have agreed that marketing
(whether parodic key with integrated merely dismantled or vocation) to neutralize itself. Again raises the question of the hic et nunc of the artwork, what kind of presence can have in the era of digitalization look. "Just as a rock invented Once the No-Wave , but the Post-Web touted by Jaron Lanier Zepel , should search on the Web -No, the opposite of the aesthetic that promotes web.
long ago I wonder what they can present different or specific as the art made especially for metaverse. Already, social networks impose their aesthetics, their poor idea of \u200b\u200bwhat may be the format of fiction that this whisper from our immediate future.
Stories "? As elementary and definitive
like each of us has a story , and we know actors up an account and crossed by hundreds and thousands of other stories , when every story is an accumulation of feelings, doubts, certainties and programmatic oversights.
I like to think hundreds of thousands of blogs and twitters and videos on Youtube or Vimeo as triggers dynamic that produces a monstrous not always random connection between so many memories in virtual time. If this site is available and interconnection, the fact is that at any other time so many stories were so interconnected and interinfluidas. Never before has a book, song, film, drawing, photograph intermarried so in such a devastating pace. And although we relentlessly pondering what kind of readers, observers, writers and producers are becoming images, increasingly more experience the thrill of being exposed and crossed by million stories to a grinding speed .
We are made of the same subject matter of these stories.
no longer read or see or hear or write the same way, although we have the impression that everything is more or less as usual.
0 comments:
Post a Comment